Event Details
July 14, 2020
Description
A hearing where the Court discussed factors related to the Defendant's flight risk.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| defendant | person | 747 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
Source Documents (2)
DOJ-OGR-00002240(1).jpg
This legal document, page 8 of a court filing dated December 30, 2020, analyzes the legal standards for a defendant's motion for bail. The court acknowledges that the defendant has met the 'limited' burden to provide evidence against the presumption of being a flight risk, citing her financial conditions and family ties. However, citing precedents like *United States v. Mercedes* and *Martir*, the court maintains that the presumption of flight does not disappear and must still be given weight, concluding that the new information does not alter its initial determination.
DOJ-OGR-00002240.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from December 30, 2020, analyzes a defendant's motion for bail. The court acknowledges that the defendant has met the 'limited' burden of producing evidence (regarding financial conditions and family ties) to counter the presumption of being a flight risk. However, citing legal precedents like United States v. Mercedes and Martir, the court asserts that this presumption does not disappear and must still be weighed, concluding that the new information does not alter its initial determination regarding release conditions.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The Government opposed the Defendant’s motion for release on bail.
2021-03-09
A legal proceeding where a defendant is tried, involving a jury, judge, and government prosecution.
Date unknown
Stages of a legal trial where a defendant's innocence is presumed and the government must prove guilt.
Date unknown
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
A court document (Document 36) was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, outlining the rules for handling discovery materials.
2020-07-30
Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.
2020-02-04 • New York
Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order.
Date unknown
Discussion of a legal motion regarding the rules for cross-examination at an upcoming trial, specifically concerning the public disclosure of the names of Minor Victims.
Date unknown • Court
Voir dire process where Juror 50 stated he had no doubt about his ability to be fair and impartial.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event