January 01, 1990
On rehearing en banc (893 F.2d 205), the Ninth Circuit court withdrew part of its previous opinion, ruling that Lear Siegler was not a prevailing party.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lear Siegler, Inc., Energy Products Division | organization | 4 | View Entity |
| Ninth Circuit | organization | 50 | View Entity |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012394.jpg
This document summarizes the legal case of Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Lehman. The Ninth Circuit initially ruled that the President acted in bad faith by refusing to comply with the Competition in Contracting Act and awarded attorneys' fees to Lear Siegler. However, upon a rehearing en banc, the court reversed its decision, ruling that Lear Siegler was not a prevailing party and withdrew the prior opinion.
Events with shared participants
The Ninth Circuit court ruled in Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Lehman (842 F.2d 1102), rejecting the President's constitutional arguments and finding Lear Siegler was a prevailing party entitled to attorneys' fees.
1988-01-01 • Ninth Circuit
The Ninth Circuit issues its initial ruling in Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Lehman, 842 F.2d 1102, rejecting the President's constitutionality arguments and finding Lear Siegler was a prevailing party entitled to attorneys' fees.
1988-01-01 • Ninth Circuit
On rehearing en banc, the Ninth Circuit court partially withdraws its prior opinion (893 F.2d 205), ruling that Lear Siegler was not a prevailing party and withdrawing the sections of the opinion quoted in the document.
1990-01-01 • Ninth Circuit
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event