Event Details

January 01, 2008

Description

United States v. Rubin court decision discussing CVRA rights

Source Documents (1)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014059.jpg

Legal Analysis / Law Review Article / House Oversight Document • 1.68 MB
View

This document is page 80 of a legal analysis (likely by Paul Cassell) included in House Oversight materials (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014059). It critiques an Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memorandum regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically arguing against the OLC's position that victim rights only apply after formal charges are filed. The text outlines specific rights that logically apply pre-charging (protection, conferencing with government attorneys, and fairness/dignity) and cites case law (US v. Rubin) and legislative history to support a broader interpretation of the Act.

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
E.D.N.Y.
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
0
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 20:45

Additional Data

Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014059.jpg
Date String
2008

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event