Date Unknown
The NPA was negotiated and signed, with terms that were later found to have unintended consequences, such as Epstein's eligibility for work release.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epstein's defense counsel | person | 6 | View Entity |
| Acosta | person | 475 | View Entity |
| Villafaña | person | 551 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00021373.jpg
This document is a page from an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report analyzing prosecutor Acosta's handling of the Epstein case. OPR concludes that Acosta's concerns about federalism led him to craft a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) that paradoxically intruded more on state authority and had negative consequences due to the federal team's unfamiliarity with the state court system. This lack of familiarity, a concern raised by fellow prosecutor Villafaña, resulted in unforeseen outcomes like Epstein obtaining work release, which was contrary to the prosecutors' intent.
Events with shared participants
September agreement
2007-09-01 • Unknown
Correspondence regarding the resolution of a dispute and agreement terms concerning Jeffrey Epstein.
2007-12-13 • Unknown
Villafaña wrote to Epstein attorney Lefkowitz regarding a dispute resolution.
2007-12-13 • Unknown
Resolution of a dispute and negotiation of an agreement regarding Jeffrey Epstein.
2007-12-13 • Unknown
Federal prosecution of Epstein
2006-01-01 • N/A
Federal prosecution of Epstein led by Acosta.
2006-01-01 • USA
Sloman instructs Villafaña to provide Lefkowitz with draft victim notification letter.
2007-11-28
Deadline set by Acosta for prosecutors not to issue victim notification letters (5 p.m. Friday).
2007-12-07
Lead case agent informed Villafaña that only 15 known victims had received notification letters.
2007-11-28
Private meeting between Acosta and Lefkowitz at a Marriott hotel in West Palm Beach regarding keeping the deal secret.
Date unknown • Marriott hotel, West Palm Beach
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event