Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
The voir dire process where prospective jurors were questioned. The document analyzes this process to determine if Juror 50 would have been challenged for cause.
Participants (4)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| prospective jurors | person | 14 | View Entity |
| Juror 50 | person | 685 | View Entity |
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
| defendant | person | 747 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00020970.jpg
This legal document is a court's analysis concluding that Juror 50 is neither impliedly nor inferably biased against the Defendant. The court reasons that the juror's personal experience of sexual abuse is insufficient to infer partiality and that, based on the voir dire of other jurors, it is unlikely the Defendant would have successfully challenged the juror for cause.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
The Government opposed the Defendant’s motion for release on bail.
2021-03-09
Jury Deliberation/Instruction
Date unknown • Courtroom
Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Initial bail hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell, which was held 12 days after her arrest.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event