February 15, 2012
Planned testimony of Ms. Conrad where she intends to assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr. Gair | person | 86 | View Entity |
| Catherine Conrad | person | 154 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009238.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of U.S. v. Daugertas. The transcript details a legal argument regarding a request to close the courtroom for the testimony of a witness, Catherine Conrad, due to sensitive information about her alcohol dependency and disciplinary proceedings. The court denies the request, citing prior disclosures of the information and the defendants' right to a public proceeding. The transcript also reveals that Ms. Conrad intends to invoke her Fifth Amendment right, and counsel has submitted an application to compel her testimony with immunity.
Events with shared participants
Court proceedings in US v. Daugerdas involving the examination of witnesses Trzaskoma and Conrad
2012-02-15 • Southern District (implied NY)
Direct examination of juror/witness Conrad regarding her conduct during voir dire.
2012-02-15 • Courtroom
Letter from Catherine Conrad to Stanley J. Oklua [sic], Esq.
2011-05-25
Certificate of Disposition for the case 'People v. Catherine Conrad'.
1998-08-21 • Criminal Court of the City of New York, County of Bronx
Court took a luncheon recess, scheduled to resume at 2:05 p.m.
2012-02-15 • Court
Afternoon session of a court inquiry, addressing matters that developed over the luncheon recess, including a financial affidavit from Ms. Conrad and her voice mail message. Examination of 'The Answerer' regarding finances.
2012-02-15 • Court
Cross-examination of juror Conrad regarding her voir dire statements.
2012-02-15 • Courtroom
Direct examination of witness Conrad in the case of U.S. v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. The questioning focuses on a letter written by the witness.
2012-02-15 • Southern District of New York
The witness, Ms. Conrad, is testifying under court order.
2012-02-15 • Courtroom
Examination of Ms. Edelstein by Mr. Okula regarding the firm's knowledge of facts related to a government note and a Catherine Conrad letter, and the ethical implications of a motion decision. The witness is excused at the end of the excerpt.
Date unknown • Southern District
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event