Event Details
August 10, 2022
Description
A discussion regarding the procedural aspects of presenting evidence, including a physical binder and a video, during a direct examination of a witness named Parkinson.
Participants (5)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| unnamed witness (implied) | person | 0 | View Entity |
| courthouse staff (mentioned) | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Honor | person | 62 | View Entity |
| Mr. Everdell | person | 1327 | View Entity |
| Ms. Comey | person | 1419 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00018233.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a conversation between a judge (THE COURT), Mr. Everdell, and Ms. Comey. The discussion centers on the logistics of presenting evidence, including whether to provide a paper binder to the court and how a video will be displayed in the main courtroom but not in an overflow room. The judge gives instructions to ensure the public can view exhibits after the video is shown.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A legal deposition where attorneys are engaged in a heated procedural dispute. Mr. Tein attempts to ask questions, while Mr. Leopold objects and criticizes Mr. Tein's behavior, leading to a tense back-and-forth.
Date unknown • Undisclosed deposition room
Cross-examination of witness Visoski by Mr. Everdell regarding flights and the identity of a passenger named Jane.
2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Jury Deliberation/Instruction
Date unknown • Courtroom
A witness, Meder, is questioned about a photograph showing Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The photograph, sourced from a CD (1B63) from the Epstein and Maxwell investigation, is admitted into evidence as Plaintiff's Exhibit 342.
2022-08-10 • Court
Court proceeding regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Legal argument regarding 'omission theory' and inconsistency in testimony.
2022-08-10 • Southern District of New York (implied by court reporters)
A discussion took place regarding jury instructions, followed by the court calling a recess.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
Cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn regarding a deposition document from October 21, 2009.
Date unknown • Courtroom
The Court called a 10-minute break in the proceedings.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event