Date Unknown
A hearing conducted by the District Court where it allegedly abused its discretion by limiting the defense's questioning of Juror 50.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juror 50 | person | 685 | View Entity |
| Defense | organization | 240 | View Entity |
| district court | organization | 595 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00021130.jpg
This legal document, part of case 22-1426, argues that the District Court abused its discretion during a post-trial hearing. The filing contends that the court improperly prevented the defense from cross-examining Juror 50, who, it is argued, would have been dismissed from the jury had he truthfully disclosed the nature of his past abuse during jury selection. The document contrasts the severe abuse suffered by Juror 50 with lesser forms of sexual assault reported by other potential jurors who were not dismissed.
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
Date referenced regarding Juror 50's testimony/disclosure status
2021-11-04 • N/A
Juror 50 commented on Annie Farmer's Twitter post
2022-01-01 • Twitter
Tentative trial date set by the court.
2020-06-08 • Courtroom
A potential juror (ID 50) answers a questionnaire to determine their suitability to serve on a jury.
Date unknown
A Post-Verdict Hearing where Juror 50 allegedly lied to the Court.
Date unknown • The Court
A trial where the Government plans to use certain statements and evidence, which is the subject of the defense's motion.
Date unknown
The District Court denied Maxwell's motion to dismiss an indictment.
Date unknown
Voir Dire process where Juror 50 allegedly concealed material information and gave false answers.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event