Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
The jury deliberated on the charges against the defendant. According to Juror 50, they read instructions, worked methodically through the counts, listed evidence on a whiteboard, and deliberated towards a consensus.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| eleven other jurors | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Juror 50 | person | 685 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009810.jpg
This document is a legal filing by the government arguing against a defendant's motion for a new trial. It cites legal precedent establishing a high bar for granting new trials and uses statements made by 'Juror 50' to The Daily Mail to demonstrate that the jury's deliberations were thorough, methodical, and proper. The government contends that the juror's account shows the verdict was based on evidence and not external pressures or improper considerations.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
Date referenced regarding Juror 50's testimony/disclosure status
2021-11-04 • N/A
Juror 50 commented on Annie Farmer's Twitter post
2022-01-01 • Twitter
A potential juror (ID 50) answers a questionnaire to determine their suitability to serve on a jury.
Date unknown
The jury acquitted Maxwell on 'count two' of the charges against her, which related specifically to the accuser Jane.
Date unknown
A Post-Verdict Hearing where Juror 50 allegedly lied to the Court.
Date unknown • The Court
Voir Dire process where Juror 50 allegedly concealed material information and gave false answers.
Date unknown
Voir dire process where Juror 50 stated he had no doubt about his ability to be fair and impartial.
Date unknown
A hearing where Juror 50 provided testimony.
Date unknown
A close, contested trial involving Ms. Maxwell where the key issue was the credibility of the accusers.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event