December 19, 2021
The U.S. Government submitted a letter to the court regarding an ambiguity in the jury charge for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. government | organization | 261 | View Entity |
| Judge Alison J. Nathan | person | 50 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00008436.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated December 19, 2021, concerning the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government identifies a significant ambiguity in Jury Instruction No. 19, where the pronoun "she" could be interpreted as referring to either the defendant or the victim. To resolve this, the Government proposes that the court replace "she" with "the individual" to ensure clarity for the jury.
Events with shared participants
LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition filed by USA regarding Discovery Disclosure and Access.
2020-08-13 • District of New York
LETTER REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell.
2020-07-29
Scheduling Order issued setting dates for discovery, motions, and trial.
2020-07-15 • Court Docket
Order denying Defendant's motion to prohibit extrajudicial statements without prejudice, while warning all parties to comply with rules.
2020-07-23 • Court Docket
LETTER MOTION filed by Ghislaine Maxwell requesting permission to submit a letter motion in excess of three pages.
2020-08-17 • District of New York
ORDER by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Defendant's motion to modify the Protective Order and file under seal, setting deadlines for opposition and reply.
2020-08-18
LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition by USA to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for permission to submit a letter motion in excess of three pages.
2020-08-21 • District of New York
LETTER by USA regarding proposed redactions to letter briefing.
2020-08-21 • District of New York
Denial of Maxwell's motion to modify a protective order.
2020-09-02 • SDNY
Submission of a photograph as Government Exhibit 328 in the legal case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
Date unknown • Court for case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event