Event Details

This document is page 801 from a 2005 legal opinion regarding the 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation (349 F.Supp.2d 765). The text discusses the 'discretionary function' exception under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and the court's finding that this exception bars claims against Saudi Royals Prince Sultan and Prince Turki, who were accused of donating to charities linked to al Qaeda. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was likely part of a Congressional document production.

A Westlaw printout of a 2005 legal opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) bearing the stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017929. The text detailed the court's decision to dismiss complaints against various entities (including Mar-Jac Poultry, IIIT, and African Muslim Agency) alleged to be part of the 'SAAR Network' and accused of funding al Qaeda or Islamic Jihad. The court ruled that the plaintiffs failed to provide specific factual grounds that these entities knew their donations were funding terrorism. There is no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell in the text of this specific page.

This document is a 2012 Appellate Brief filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation. It lists numerous attorneys representing the Plaintiffs-Appellants and includes a Corporate Disclosure Statement detailing the corporate structures and name changes of various entities involved, primarily related to Cantor Fitzgerald and BGC Partners. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023361), suggesting it was part of a congressional investigation.

This document is a page from a 2005 legal opinion (392 F.Supp.2d 539) regarding litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It details rulings on motions to dismiss for various defendants including the Success Foundation (dismissed), Wa'el Jalaidan (denied), IIRO (denied), Rabita Trust (denied), and the SAAR Network. It discusses allegations of financial support for al Qaeda and corporate structures involving entities in Herndon, Virginia. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a congressional inquiry, potentially related to financial oversight, though Jeffrey Epstein is not explicitly mentioned on this specific page.

This document is page 20 of a legal opinion (392 F.Supp.2d 539) regarding *In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001*. It discusses the court's jurisdiction over defendants Wa'el Jalaidan and the Rabita Trust, detailing Jalaidan's alleged role as a founder and logistics chief for al Qaeda and his connections to Osama bin Laden. While the document bears a House Oversight stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017923), often associated with broader financial investigations, the text itself focuses strictly on 9/11 terrorist financing liability and does not mention Jeffrey Epstein.