Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
Brune confirms he conducted many Grand Jury investigations during his time as an assistant.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brune | person | 216 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009309.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal testimony where a witness named Brune is under direct examination. Brune clarifies that a female colleague had a limited role in a past trial, assisting with the closing statement but not being part of the trial team. He also discusses his own legal experience, including conducting many Grand Jury investigations and his pride in his law firm.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Ms. Brune is giving testimony under direct examination.
Date unknown • Courtroom
A direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the legal team and paralegals involved in the 'Parma matter'.
Date unknown • Unspecified
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the jury selection process (voir dire).
Date unknown
A past voir dire process is discussed, where the plan was for Judge Pauley to question potential juror Catherine M. Conrad to determine if she was the same person from a court opinion.
Date unknown
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding their legal experience and a specific trial.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
The witness, Brune, confirms having conducted many Grand Jury investigations in a past role as an assistant.
Date unknown
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding a colleague's involvement in a trial and his own legal experience.
Date unknown • Court proceeding
The witness, Brune, was out of the country.
0015-05-01 • out of the country
The witness, Brune, first learned about the voir dire.
0018-07-01
Direct examination of witness Brune regarding jury selection procedures for a specific case.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event