Event Details

August 10, 2022

Description

Defense Summation by Ms. Menninger

Participants (3)

Name Type Mentions
jury (implied) person 2 View Entity
MS. MENNINGER person 1436 View Entity
court location 177 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00014485.jpg

Court Transcript (Summation/Closing Argument) • 658 KB
View

This document is a page from the defense summation (closing argument) by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense argues that the testimonies of accusers 'Carolyn' and 'Jane' are unreliable because their stories changed over time to implicate Maxwell after pressure from lawyers and the FBI. Specifically, it notes that Carolyn's 2008 lawsuit against Epstein and Sarah Kellen never mentioned Maxwell, and alleges that Jane was coached to identify Maxwell as the woman with the 'foreign accent' present during the abuse.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

A deposition was conducted, as evidenced by the transcript.

Date unknown • Not specified

View

The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.

Date unknown

View

Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).

2022-08-10 • Courtroom

View

A witness, Meder, is questioned about a photograph showing Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The photograph, sourced from a CD (1B63) from the Epstein and Maxwell investigation, is admitted into evidence as Plaintiff's Exhibit 342.

2022-08-10 • Court

View

Cross-examination of witness Jane by Ms. Menninger in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.

2022-08-10

View

Court hearing regarding redactions and public release of evidence.

2022-08-10 • Courtroom

View

The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.

Date unknown

View

A legal argument during a court proceeding regarding the admissibility of photographs found in Mr. Epstein's home.

2022-08-10 • Courtroom

View

Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.

2020-02-04 • New York

View

A discussion took place regarding the procedural rules for the length and scope of the closing and rebuttal arguments.

2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Courtroom (Southern District of New York implied)
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
3
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-21 00:38

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00014485.jpg
Date String
2022-08-10

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event