Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
Voir dire process during which Juror 50 was questioned and allegedly gave a false answer.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juror 50 | person | 685 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009136.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that there is no basis to find that 'Juror 50' committed a 'deliberate falsehood' during the jury selection process (voir dire). It cites several legal precedents, primarily from the Second Circuit, to establish that juror misconduct requires proving intentional deceit, not just an honest mistake or failure to answer. The document concludes that the current record does not meet this high threshold to prove dishonesty by Juror 50.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
Date referenced regarding Juror 50's testimony/disclosure status
2021-11-04 • N/A
Juror 50 commented on Annie Farmer's Twitter post
2022-01-01 • Twitter
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
A potential juror (ID 50) answers a questionnaire to determine their suitability to serve on a jury.
Date unknown
Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.
2020-02-04 • New York
A Post-Verdict Hearing where Juror 50 allegedly lied to the Court.
Date unknown • The Court
Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order.
Date unknown
Voir Dire process where Juror 50 allegedly concealed material information and gave false answers.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event