Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
A speaker in court argues that Ghislaine Maxwell's actions regarding Jane's travel do not constitute illegal 'enticement'.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speaker (unnamed) | person | 10 | View Entity |
| your Honor | person | 807 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00016457.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding, filed on August 10, 2022. A speaker, likely a defense attorney, argues that their client, Ghislaine Maxwell, did not illegally 'entice' a witness named Jane to travel. The argument asserts that arranging a return flight does not qualify as enticement, that Jane's travel was typically handled by Jeffrey Epstein's office, and that there is no testimony Maxwell encouraged, convinced, or even offered to arrange the travel in question.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
An attorney makes a statement to the judge regarding the scope of Mr. Flatley's testimony.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Cross-examination of witness Loftus regarding the nature of memory studies they have conducted.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Mr. Everdell questions witness Mr. Sud about his residence and his employment history and role at Shoppers Travel.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
A summation is being given in a trial, arguing that accusers' memories have shifted over time.
Date unknown • Courtroom
A long trial is mentioned as the context for the events being discussed.
Date unknown • Court
Legal arguments are being made regarding a defendant's active participation in offenses, the sufficiency of proof at trial, and the potential application of a 'conscious avoidance theory' instruction to the jury, particularly concerning cases involving children.
2022-08-10 • court
Ms. Brune is giving testimony under direct examination.
Date unknown • Courtroom
A court hearing where the government is arguing that the defendant is a flight risk and should not be released.
2021-04-01 • United States
A lawyer is presenting arguments to a judge regarding a client's case, discussing past conduct (1994-1997), bail factors (3142 factors), and the client's custody. The judge interrupts to ask for clarification from Mr. Cohen.
Date unknown • Court (implied by 'THE COURT', 'Second Circuit', 'Supreme Court', 'Southern District')
Direct examination of witness Parkinson regarding Government Exhibits 201-222.
2022-08-10 • Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event