August 22, 2022
Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms. Ransome | person | 23 | View Entity |
| Ms. Stein | person | 14 | View Entity |
| Ms. Sternheim | person | 877 | View Entity |
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
| Defense counsel | person | 578 | View Entity |
| GHISLAINE MAXWELL | person | 9575 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00014828.jpg
This document is page 81 of a court transcript from the sentencing hearing of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 22, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim argues that the government's requested sentence is disproportionate and notes that the Probation Department recommended a downward variance to 20 years. Sternheim explicitly argues that Jeffrey Epstein was 'far more culpable' than Maxwell, yet would have faced the same sentencing guidelines.
DOJ-OGR-00014829.jpg
This document is a page from the sentencing transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 22, 2022. The defense attorney argues for a lighter sentence based on 3553(a) factors, citing Maxwell's traumatic childhood marked by her brother's coma and death, and her 'narcissistic, brutish' father. The defense also attempts to mitigate her culpability by characterizing Jeffrey Epstein as 'controlling, demanding, [and] manipulative,' claiming he cast a deceptive shadow over her adulthood.
DOJ-OGR-00011592.jpg
This document is page 73 of a court transcript from the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on July 22, 2022. It features the conclusion of a victim impact statement by Ms. Ransome, who condemns Maxwell's lack of remorse and asserts her own survival. Following this, the Court introduces Ms. Stein, who begins her statement by recounting her move to New York in 1991 to attend FIT and her subsequent employment at Henri Bendel, where she encountered Maxwell.
Events with shared participants
Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel filed on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell
2021-03-30 • 02nd Circuit Court of Appeals
A shipment discussed in court, sent from Ghislaine Maxwell to Casey Wasserman. The event is stated to have occurred in 'October'.
Date unknown
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
LETTER REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell.
2020-07-29
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
Filing or processing of the Reply Memorandum in Support of Third Motion for Bail
2021-04-01 • Federal Court (Implied)
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Filing of Document 172-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
2021-03-23 • US District Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event