July 01, 0022
A phone call occurred where Brune discussed his strategy for presenting facts related to a waiver issue.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brune | person | 216 | View Entity |
| Interviewer | person | 24 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00010041.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Brune, filed on March 24, 2022. Brune testifies about the circumstances surrounding the filing of a legal brief, explaining that he informed other lawyers on the case about his team's investigation, and they were completely surprised by the findings. He also discusses a July 22nd call and his strategic thinking regarding a potential "waiver issue" that he anticipated the government would raise.
Events with shared participants
Interview or Q&A session
Date unknown • Not specified
Ms. Brune is giving testimony under direct examination.
Date unknown • Courtroom
A direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the legal team and paralegals involved in the 'Parma matter'.
Date unknown • Unspecified
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the jury selection process (voir dire).
Date unknown
A past voir dire process is discussed, where the plan was for Judge Pauley to question potential juror Catherine M. Conrad to determine if she was the same person from a court opinion.
Date unknown
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding their legal experience and a specific trial.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
The witness, Brune, confirms having conducted many Grand Jury investigations in a past role as an assistant.
Date unknown
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding a colleague's involvement in a trial and his own legal experience.
Date unknown • Court proceeding
The witness, Brune, was out of the country.
0015-05-01 • out of the country
The witness, Brune, first learned about the voir dire.
0018-07-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event