December 10, 2020
An attorney presents an argument to a judge regarding the defendant's case, specifically addressing factors for detention and a perjury charge.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your Honor (Judge) | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Unidentified speaker (attorney) | person | 0 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00001935.jpg
This document is a court transcript from December 10, 2020, where an attorney argues against the detention of their client. The attorney refutes the government's claim that a perjury charge should warrant detention, framing it as a simple denial of guilt during a deposition and emphasizing the defendant's right to be presumed innocent. The speaker also notes the government has been investigating the case for ten years and requests the proceedings remain open to present more facts.
Events with shared participants
A court hearing where an attorney is making an argument to a judge.
Date unknown
An attorney makes a statement to the judge regarding the scope of Mr. Flatley's testimony.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A court proceeding where the speaker, a convicted associate of Jeffrey Epstein, makes a statement to the judge.
2023-06-29 • Courtroom
Discussion regarding the schedule for jury deliberation in a trial, specifically concerning whether jurors should deliberate through the weekend and New Year's. The discussion is influenced by a spike in COVID-19 omicron variant cases in New York City, which poses a risk to trial completion.
2022-08-10 • Implied to be a court in New York City
A court hearing to determine bail conditions for a defendant. The speaker, likely the defense attorney, is making arguments to the judge.
2020-12-10 • A court in the Southern District
A court hearing where the government argued for the pretrial detention of the defendant.
2019-07-16 • Court
A prosecutor is arguing against granting bail to a defendant, citing concerns about her financial disclosures and flight risk.
Date unknown • court
An attorney is arguing in a bail hearing, challenging the relevance of evidence presented by the government and outlining the legal standard for pretrial release under statute 3142.
2020-12-10 • court
An attorney presents a legal argument distinguishing an Ex Post Facto issue from a Sixth Amendment Apprendi issue, arguing a specific decision should be made by the jury.
2022-07-22 • Court in the Southern District
An attorney presents an argument to a judge that there is insufficient evidence to establish enticement related to arranging travel.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event