Event Details

June 15, 2022

Description

Filing of Document 663 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE

Participants (6)

Name Type Mentions
Legal Counsel person 2 View Entity
Defense Attorneys person 13 View Entity
Ms. Maxwell person 1982 View Entity
Defense counsel person 578 View Entity
court location 177 View Entity
GHISLAINE MAXWELL person 9575 View Entity

Source Documents (6)

DOJ-OGR-00010449.jpg

Legal Filing (Sentencing Memorandum) • 681 KB
View

This document is page 3 of a sentencing memorandum filed on June 15, 2022, on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense argues that a 240-month sentence recommended by Probation is excessive given the conditions of her confinement (solitary, threats against her life) and argues she should not receive a sentence appropriate for Epstein. It also provides context regarding the previous 'sweetheart deal' Epstein received in Florida under Alexander Acosta, noting the public outcry that followed.

DOJ-OGR-00010467.jpg

Legal Filing (Sentencing Memorandum) • 686 KB
View

This document is page 21 of a sentencing memorandum filed by the defense for Ghislaine Maxwell on June 15, 2022. The defense argues for a 'non-guidelines sentence' (downward variance), contending that Maxwell should not be treated as harshly as Jeffrey Epstein (who they argue was more culpable) or Harvey Weinstein (who received 23 years for forcible rape). The text highlights that the Probation Department recommended 240 months, while the Guidelines range was 292-365 months, which the defense claims is unjust given her age (60), the age of the offenses (18-28 years prior), and her lack of criminal history.

DOJ-OGR-00010482.jpg

Court Filing (Defense Sentencing Memorandum) • 695 KB
View

This document is a page from a defense sentencing memorandum filed on June 15, 2022, arguing that Ghislaine Maxwell should receive sentencing credits for harsh pretrial detention conditions. The text portrays Maxwell as a hardworking humanitarian who helped launch the Clinton Global Initiative and founded TerraMar, while characterizing her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein as a singular mistake resulting from vulnerability caused by her father's death.

DOJ-OGR-00010464.jpg

Legal Filing (Sentencing Memorandum) • 619 KB
View

This document is page 17 (PDF page 18) of a sentencing memorandum filed on June 15, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines the legal standards for sentencing under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), citing Supreme Court precedents like Gall and Nelson. The text argues that these statutory factors, specifically the need for just punishment and Ms. Maxwell's history, weigh heavily in favor of the proposed sentence.

DOJ-OGR-00010509.jpg

Court Filing Exhibit Cover Page • 172 KB
View

This document is a separator cover sheet for 'Exhibit H' filed on June 15, 2022, as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00010509.

DOJ-OGR-00010466.jpg

Legal Filing (Sentencing Memorandum/Defense Motion) • 772 KB
View

This is page 20 of a defense sentencing memorandum filed on June 15, 2022, for Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues against the Probation Office's recommendation for a harsh sentence based on 'general deterrence,' claiming that sexual predators are rarely deterred and that deterring the wealthy is too broad a justification. The defense explicitly states that Jeffrey Epstein was the 'main offender' and requests a 'significantly below-guidelines sentence' for Maxwell.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel filed on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell

2021-03-30 • 02nd Circuit Court of Appeals

View

A shipment discussed in court, sent from Ghislaine Maxwell to Casey Wasserman. The event is stated to have occurred in 'October'.

Date unknown

View

LETTER REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell.

2020-07-29

View

Signing of Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between USAO and Epstein.

Date unknown • Unknown

View

Ms. Maxwell has been incarcerated for 225 days in de facto solitary confinement, monitored 24 hours a day by guards with a handheld camera.

2021-02-16 • MDC

View

The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.

Date unknown

View

Ms. Maxwell is being forced to prepare for trial with a computer that cannot do research or search documents, which is argued to be an inconceivable condition for preparation.

Date unknown • prison/jail

View

Filing or processing of the Reply Memorandum in Support of Third Motion for Bail

2021-04-01 • Federal Court (Implied)

View

Ms. Maxwell sent a detailed letter requesting the production of discovery materials.

2020-10-13

View

Filing of Document 172-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN

2021-03-23 • US District Court

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Court
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
6
Source Documents
6
Extracted
2025-11-20 20:53

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00010449.jpg
Date String
2022-06-15

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event