Event Details

This document is an email thread from December 30-31, 2019, between Assistant U.S. Attorneys in the Southern District of New York. They discuss establishing a protocol (specifically Touhy Requests) for handling document requests from civil plaintiffs suing Jeffrey Epstein and his estate. The emails specifically mention a narrow request from attorney Robbie Kaplan and reference a status conference scheduled for January 10, 2020.

This legal document is a filing by the Government arguing that it has fulfilled its discovery obligations under Brady, Giglio, and Rule 16. The Government details the materials it has produced, including records surrounding Epstein's suicide and employee files for Noel and Thomas, and cites legal precedents from the Southern District of New York to support its position that the defendant's motion to compel further discovery should be denied.

This document is an email chain from May 21, 2021, between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the DOJ Office of the Inspector General (OIG). The correspondence concerns the drafting of a public letter regarding a deferred prosecution agreement for the two guards on duty the night of Jeffrey Epstein's suicide. The USANYS sought OIG approval to state that the guards agreed to be interviewed as part of an ongoing OIG investigation expected to lead to a public report.

This document is an internal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) email chain dated December 6, 2019, coordinating a response to a media inquiry from the NY Daily News. The reporter asks six specific questions regarding facility conditions, staff morale, hiring practices, and policy changes at MCC New York following Jeffrey Epstein's suicide and subsequent charges against guards for falsifying documents. The proposed responses to these questions are entirely redacted under exemption (b)(5).

This document is an internal Bureau of Prisons email thread from December 6, 2019, coordinating a response to a New York Daily News inquiry. The reporter asked detailed questions about low morale, funding, hiring surges, and staff attrition at MCC Manhattan following Jeffrey Epstein's suicide and the subsequent charges against guards for falsifying documents. The proposed responses from the BOP are almost entirely redacted under deliberative process privileges.

This page is a transcript from a court hearing dated September 3, 2019, in the case United States v. Epstein. It concludes a victim impact statement expressing frustration over Epstein's suicide escaping justice, but gratitude for the handling of the current case compared to the past. Attorney Mr. Edwards then addresses the court, referencing a 2008 case filed under the Crime Victims Rights Act and introducing his co-counsel, former judge Paul Cassell.