May 19, 2008
Starr and Whitley co-authored a letter to Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip asking for a review of the federal involvement in the Epstein case.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whitley | person | 12 | View Entity |
| Mark Filip | person | 71 | View Entity |
| Starr | person | 64 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00021308.jpg
This legal document details communications from May 2008 regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case, where his defense team, including Starr and Whitley, petitioned the Deputy Attorney General for a review. They argued the federal prosecution was unwarranted, irregular, and politically motivated due to Epstein's "close personal association" with former President Bill Clinton. In response, a Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General instructed the U.S. Attorney's Office to postpone a June 2, 2008 plea deadline pending the completion of this high-level review.
Events with shared participants
Submission of legal letter requesting cessation of federal investigation.
2008-05-19 • N/A
Starr transmitted two lengthy submissions authored by Lefkowitz to Acosta.
2007-12-11
Legal case: Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419
1995-01-01 • U.S. Supreme Court
OPR conducted more than 60 interviews of witnesses.
Date unknown
Roth sent a letter to Starr and Lefkowitz concluding the federal review of the Epstein case.
2008-06-23
Acosta, other USAO Attorneys, and FBI Supervisors meet with Epstein's attorneys.
2007-09-07
Acosta and Sloman spoke with Epstein's defense team about a media leak and their desire for a 'watered-down resolution' to the case.
2008-01-07
The case of Kyles v. Whitley was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.
1995-01-01 • U.S.
Narrator worked at Kirkland & Ellis.
Date unknown • Kirkland & Ellis
A meeting where the defense team presented their federalism arguments. Acosta intended it to be for discussing 'general legal policy only' and not a negotiation.
2007-09-07
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event