You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

Event Details

Date Unknown

Description

Redirect examination of Ms. Brune by Mr. Davis, during which Government Exhibit 28 (a letter from Ms. Brune) is admitted into evidence.

Participants (4)

Name Type Mentions
Ms. Brune person 82 View Entity
Mr. Shechtman person 126 View Entity
MR. DAVIS person 17 View Entity
your Honor person 807 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00010052.jpg

Unknown type • 379 KB
View

This document is a page from a court transcript detailing the redirect examination of a witness, Ms. Brune, by an attorney, Mr. Davis. During the examination, a document identified as Ms. Brune's "July 21st letter at the Court" is introduced as Government Exhibit 28. After opposing counsel, Mr. Shechtman, states he has no objection, the Court officially receives the exhibit into evidence.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Court proceedings in US v. Daugerdas involving the examination of witnesses Trzaskoma and Conrad

2012-02-15 • Southern District (implied NY)

View

An attorney makes a statement to the judge regarding the scope of Mr. Flatley's testimony.

2022-08-10 • Courtroom

View

Cross-examination of witness Loftus regarding the nature of memory studies they have conducted.

2022-08-10 • Courtroom

View

Conclusion of an evidentiary hearing where the defense and government both rest their cases. The judge then sets requirements for post-hearing briefs.

2022-02-24 • Court

View

Mr. Everdell questions witness Mr. Sud about his residence and his employment history and role at Shoppers Travel.

2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)

View

A summation is being given in a trial, arguing that accusers' memories have shifted over time.

Date unknown • Courtroom

View

Direct examination of Mr. Schoeman by Mr. Shechtman.

Date unknown • Courtroom

View

A long trial is mentioned as the context for the events being discussed.

Date unknown • Court

View

Legal arguments are being made regarding a defendant's active participation in offenses, the sufficiency of proof at trial, and the potential application of a 'conscious avoidance theory' instruction to the jury, particularly concerning cases involving children.

2022-08-10 • court

View

Direct examination of Ms. Brune regarding her knowledge and actions during the voir dire process.

Date unknown • Court (implied)

View

Event Metadata

Type
Court hearing
Location
The Court
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
4
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 14:35

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00010052.jpg
Date String
N/A

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event