Event Details
January 01, 1982
Description
The Smith v. Phillips case, cited in Justice Blackmun's concurring opinion.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smith | person | 90 | View Entity |
| Phillips | person | 23 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009884.jpg
This legal document page argues that a new trial is warranted when a biased juror is seated, regardless of whether the juror's false answers during voir dire were deliberate or inadvertent. It cites several Supreme Court and Second Circuit cases, including McDonough, Langford, and Leonard, to support this interpretation and refutes the government's contrary reading of these precedents. The argument centers on the idea that the key issue is juror bias, not the intent behind a juror's dishonesty.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Smith v. Phillips, 455 U.S. 209 (1982)
1982-01-01
Legal case: United States v. Smith, 985 F. Supp. 2d 547
2014-01-01 • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Legal case: United States v. Smith, No. 05 Cr. 922 (DLC), 2007 WL 980431
2007-04-03 • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Conte, Wolf, and Smith interviewed 26 offenders about their crimes, focusing on how they identify vulnerable children.
1989-01-01
The case of Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735, 743-44 was decided, reinforcing the third-party doctrine.
1979-01-01 • Maryland
The District of New Mexico issued a decision in the case of United States v. Smith.
2020-01-01 • District of New Mexico
United States v. Smith, 985 F. Supp. 2d 506
2013-01-01 • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Arrival of 10 new inmates
2019-07-11 • Intake
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event