Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
A speaker, likely a lawyer, is presenting an argument to a judge ('your Honor') regarding the interpretation of a juror's note and its implications for prejudice in a case involving a Mr. Parse.
Participants (4)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr. Parse (subject) | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Catherine Conrad (subject) | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Honor (presiding judge) | person | 0 | View Entity |
| unnamed speaker (lawyer) | person | 0 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00010183.jpg
Unknown type
• 476 KB
This document is a transcript of a legal argument in court. A lawyer is addressing a judge ('your Honor') about whether a mistake made by a 'Mr. Parse' constituted defrauding the government. The core of the argument revolves around a juror's note written by Catherine Conrad and whether it can be used to infer prejudice, with the lawyer citing Rule 606(b) and a Third Circuit case to argue against its use for that purpose.
Event Metadata
Type
legal argument
Location
court
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
4
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 17:50
Additional Data
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010183.jpg
Date String
N/A
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event