Event Details
March 11, 2022
Description
Filing of Document 647
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Defense Attorneys | person | 13 | View Entity |
| Defense counsel | person | 578 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
Source Documents (3)
DOJ-OGR-00010268.jpg
This document is the Table of Contents for a legal filing (Document 647) in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on March 11, 2022. The filing outlines arguments that the Court erred in its response to a jury note regarding intent requirements for Count Four and argues that the three conspiracy counts are multiplicitous because they stem from a single criminal scheme. It concludes with a request for the Court to grant Maxwell's other motions.
DOJ-OGR-00010274.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated March 11, 2022, arguing that the jury in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial had a fundamental misunderstanding of 'Count Four.' The defense argues that the jury asked if intent for sexual activity in New Mexico was sufficient for a conviction based on 'violation of New York law,' and asserts the Court failed to properly correct this misunderstanding.
DOJ-OGR-00010286.jpg
This document is page 20 of a legal filing (Document 647) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on March 11, 2022. The text argues that 'Count Five' (related to Florida/Carolyn) is multiplicitous because it is a subset of the broader 'Count Three,' citing the lack of independent conspiracy. It references testimony from victims Jane, Kate, and Annie Farmer regarding sexual abuse at Epstein's properties in New Mexico, London, the US Virgin Islands, and Palm Beach.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Signing of Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between USAO and Epstein.
Date unknown • Unknown
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
Filing of Document 172-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
2021-03-23 • US District Court
Defense team presents MySpace evidence to discredit a victim.
Date unknown • Unknown
Defense attorneys show investigators a MySpace page of a victim holding a beer to discredit her.
Date unknown • Unknown
Defense team presentation of MySpace evidence to investigators.
Date unknown • Unknown
A status conference originally scheduled for January 14, 2021, was adjourned to March 17, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. The conference is to be conducted remotely via videoconferencing software.
2021-03-17 • Remote (videoconference)
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
A court document (Document 36) was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, outlining the rules for handling discovery materials.
2020-07-30
An endorsement was filed granting a request for a video monitor for defense counsel, signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
2021-11-22 • 40 Foley Square
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event