Event Details
December 04, 2019
Description
Deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Anonymously (prior to extension).
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| plaintiff | person | 42 | View Entity |
| defendants | person | 21 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
014.pdf
Legal correspondence from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Lorna G. Schofield requesting an extension for the defendants (Indyke and Kahn, executors of the Epstein Estate) to respond to a motion by Jane Doe 1000. The judge endorsed the letter on December 5, 2019, granting an adjournment of the deadline to January 16, 2020.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Discussion of the 'Sabhnani' case, a Second Circuit case
Date unknown
Approximate start of abuse against Plaintiff (26 years prior to 2020, when she was 14).
1994-01-01 • Unknown
Initial Pretrial Conference set to occur.
2019-12-06 • Court
Concluding defendants did not present a flight risk
1990-01-01 • D. Mass.
The Government produced hundreds of hours of video surveillance footage dating back to July 5, 2019, as part of its discovery obligations.
2019-07-05
A telephone conference was held where the Court questioned the defendants about their knowledge of issues with Juror Conrad.
0015-07-01
A status conference, originally scheduled for September 9, 2020, was adjourned to September 10, 2020, at 1:00 p.m. The conference will be conducted remotely via videoconferencing. Audio access is provided for co-counsel, press, and the public via phone with an access code.
2020-09-10 • Remote (videoconference)
The underlying legal trial during which Conrad served as a juror.
Date unknown
The Court held a telephone conference to inquire about the defendants' knowledge of facts concerning Juror Conrad.
2025-11-07
One or both of the defendants in the indictment may have conducted rounds or inmate counts.
2019-08-10
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event