Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
A hearing where Juror 50's credibility was assessed, from which statements are being drawn for the appeal.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juror 50 | person | 685 | View Entity |
| Judge Nathan | person | 619 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00021722.jpg
This legal document details the rejection of defendant Maxwell's appeal arguments concerning Juror 50. Judge Nathan found Maxwell's claim of implied bias, based on the juror's personal history, to be unfounded, noting that the defense failed to pursue follow-up questions during voir dire. The document upholds Judge Nathan's determination that Juror 50 was credible, despite erroneous questionnaire answers, and that his post-verdict statements were properly disregarded.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
Judge Nathan issued an Order denying Maxwell's motion to modify a Protective Order
2020-10-02 • District Court
Date referenced regarding Juror 50's testimony/disclosure status
2021-11-04 • N/A
Submission of Ghislaine Maxwell's Response to Letter Motions to Quash subpoena to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program.
2021-11-22 • Email/Court Filing
Juror 50 commented on Annie Farmer's Twitter post
2022-01-01 • Twitter
Filing date of the court document (Sentencing submission or transcript).
2022-08-22 • Court
A potential juror (ID 50) answers a questionnaire to determine their suitability to serve on a jury.
Date unknown
A Post-Verdict Hearing where Juror 50 allegedly lied to the Court.
Date unknown • The Court
A victim impact statement being delivered to a judge regarding the sentencing of Maxwell.
2023-06-29
Voir Dire process where Juror 50 allegedly concealed material information and gave false answers.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event