Event Details

February 24, 2022

Description

Document 614 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.

Participants (3)

Name Type Mentions
Abbe David Lowell person 8 View Entity
Christopher D. Man person 6 View Entity
Joel B. Rudin person 6 View Entity

Source Documents (2)

DOJ-OGR-00009111.jpg

Court Filing (Legal Brief/Motion) • 825 KB
View

This is page 4 of a legal filing (Document 614) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 24, 2022. The text argues that modern jurors in high-profile trials are incentivized to lie during voir dire to gain fame and profit, contrasting this with historical adherence to oaths. It cites interviews with jurors from the Derek Chauvin and Harvey Weinstein trials as evidence of jurors seeking media attention.

DOJ-OGR-00009118.jpg

legal document • 670 KB
View

This document is the conclusion of a legal filing, dated February 24, 2022, arguing for a new trial based on juror bias. The attorneys contend that "Juror 50" exhibited both implied and inferred bias due to past experiences and media statements, rendering them unfit to serve despite claims of impartiality. The filing cites legal precedents, including phrases from Chief Justice Marshall, to argue that the juror should have been disqualified to protect the defendant's right to a fair trial.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Electronic submission of a motion to the Clerk of Court.

2022-02-17

View

Event Metadata

Type
legal filing
Location
Unknown
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
3
Source Documents
2
Extracted
2025-11-20 15:45

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00009118.jpg
Date String
2022-02-24

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event