July 12, 2021
Scheduled trial date for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| federal prosecutors | person | 19 | View Entity |
| GHISLAINE MAXWELL | person | 9575 | View Entity |
EFTA00030529.pdf
This document is an email chain from late October and early November 2020 concerning the potential expert testimony of Dawn Hughes, a Clinical and Forensic Psychologist, for the federal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Federal prosecutors contacted Dr. Hughes to inquire about her availability to testify, leading to discussions about scheduling and the exchange of her CV and engagement agreement. Roberta Kaplan, Esq. is also mentioned as a contact.
Events with shared participants
Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel filed on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell
2021-03-30 • 02nd Circuit Court of Appeals
A shipment discussed in court, sent from Ghislaine Maxwell to Casey Wasserman. The event is stated to have occurred in 'October'.
Date unknown
A secret non-prosecution agreement was approved by U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, granting federal immunity to Jeffrey Epstein and keeping the deal from his victims.
2008-01-01 • Southern District of Florida
A New York Post article reported that Jeffrey Epstein's lawyers were negotiating a plea deal with federal prosecutors for a 15-month jail sentence.
2007-09-20 • Not specified
Federal intervention in Epstein's case, which the text describes as an 'overreach' resulting in a 'federally-forced deal' and a jail sentence.
Date unknown
Epstein's lawyers were reportedly negotiating a plea deal with federal prosecutors for a potential 15-month prison sentence for soliciting underage girls.
2007-09-20
Intervention by the U.S. Attorney's Office ('the feds'), which imposed a 'federally-forced deal' on Epstein, including a jail sentence and financial payments to victims.
Date unknown • United States
LETTER REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell.
2020-07-29
Government admitted in court filings that prosecutors backed down on victim notifications due to pressure from Epstein's lawyers.
2013-01-01 • Court Filings
Filing or processing of the Reply Memorandum in Support of Third Motion for Bail
2021-04-01 • Federal Court (Implied)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event