Date Unknown
Jane's flight to New Mexico, which the jury's note identifies as the trip where the intent for sexual activity may have existed.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jane | person | 608 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00008935.jpg
This legal document from a court case, filed on February 11, 2022, details arguments over jury instructions concerning whether an offense must be a violation of New York law, even if events occurred in New Mexico. It highlights a specific note from the deliberating jury asking for clarification on Count Four, questioning if defendant Ms. Maxwell could be convicted for aiding a victim's (Jane's) return flight if the criminal intent was tied to the initial flight to New Mexico. The court declined to provide clarifying instructions, referring the jury back to the original charge.
Events with shared participants
One of three flights shown to the witness, which may have had a passenger with the first name 'Jane'.
1996-01-01
The witness, Jane, hired an attorney, Mr. Glassman.
2019-01-01
Jane's flight from New Jersey to New Mexico.
1997-01-01 • New Jersey to New Mexico
Jane's first trip to New York, coinciding with The Lion King release.
1997-01-01 • New York
Jane's trip to Europe with her family.
1998-01-01 • Europe
The witness provided a statement to the government, which is the subject of the cross-examination.
2019-09-19
Cross-examination of witness Jane by Ms. Menninger in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10
An alleged encounter where Ghislaine and Jeffrey Epstein met the witness. The details of this encounter are being disputed.
Date unknown
Jane was placed on at least one flight with Maxwell, as evidenced by flight logs.
Date unknown
The continuation of a trial, specifically the cross-examination of a witness testifying under the pseudonym 'Jane' by Ms. Menninger.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event