September 16, 2009
Deposition of plaintiffs (Jane Doe Nos. 2-8) was scheduled/taking place. Jeffrey Epstein viewed it via video feed from home.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epstein's attorneys | person | 31 | View Entity |
| Jane Doe Nos. 2-8 | person | 2 | View Entity |
| Jeffrey Epstein (remote) | person | 0 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00030296.tif
This court document is an affidavit or declaration by Jeffrey Epstein related to a protective order and motion concerning his attendance at depositions for 'Jane Doe Nos. 2-8' in case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM. Epstein states that on September 16, 2009, his attorneys instructed him not to attend the deposition in person, so he viewed it remotely via video feed from his home. After the deposition was assumed to have begun, Epstein left the building with his driver, Igor Zinoviev, and avoided interaction with two women, one he believed to be Jane Doe No. 4.
Events with shared participants
Government admitted in court filings that prosecutors backed down on victim notifications due to pressure from Epstein's lawyers.
2013-01-01 • Court Filings
Epstein's attorneys allegedly investigated members of the Palm Beach Police Department and ordered private investigators to intimidate victims' families.
Date unknown
Epstein's attorneys challenged the USAO's position regarding victim notification.
2007-12-01 • N/A
Negotiations between Epstein's legal team and the USAO, resulting in benefits for Epstein such as a reduction in prison time and other concessions.
Date unknown
Epstein hires additional attorneys, who then meet with Acosta.
2007-01-01
The USAO met with Epstein's attorneys and offered to end its investigation if Epstein met certain conditions.
2007-07-31
A non-prosecution agreement (NPA) was signed, culminating a state-based resolution of the federal investigation.
2007-09-24
Attorneys for Epstein began aggressively investigating victims and presenting material to the State Attorney's Office to undermine their credibility.
Date unknown
Epstein's attorneys appealed to Main Justice in an unsuccessful attempt to void the Non-Prosecution Agreement.
Date unknown
Private investigators used by Epstein's attorneys interviewed a person of interest. An allegation was made that they impersonated police officers.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event