Event Details
December 19, 2019
Description
A discussion during a court proceeding regarding the defense's request for a timeline on an inspector general's report and the government's discovery obligations.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MS. DONALESKI | person | 11 | View Entity |
| MR. FIGGINS | person | 19 | View Entity |
| your Honor | person | 807 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00021983.jpg
This is a transcript of a court proceeding from December 19, 2019, in case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. Defense counsel, Mr. Figgins, requests that the court obtain a timeline from the government for an inspector general's report, which he believes is vital for his case. The government's counsel, Ms. Donaleski, responds that she does not have a timeline for the report but assures the court that all relevant discovery materials will be provided to the defense.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
An attorney makes a statement to the judge regarding the scope of Mr. Flatley's testimony.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Cross-examination of witness Loftus regarding the nature of memory studies they have conducted.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Mr. Everdell questions witness Mr. Sud about his residence and his employment history and role at Shoppers Travel.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
A summation is being given in a trial, arguing that accusers' memories have shifted over time.
Date unknown • Courtroom
A long trial is mentioned as the context for the events being discussed.
Date unknown • Court
Legal arguments are being made regarding a defendant's active participation in offenses, the sufficiency of proof at trial, and the potential application of a 'conscious avoidance theory' instruction to the jury, particularly concerning cases involving children.
2022-08-10 • court
Ms. Brune is giving testimony under direct examination.
Date unknown • Courtroom
A court hearing where the government is arguing that the defendant is a flight risk and should not be released.
2021-04-01 • United States
A lawyer is presenting arguments to a judge regarding a client's case, discussing past conduct (1994-1997), bail factors (3142 factors), and the client's custody. The judge interrupts to ask for clarification from Mr. Cohen.
Date unknown • Court (implied by 'THE COURT', 'Second Circuit', 'Supreme Court', 'Southern District')
Direct examination of witness Parkinson regarding Government Exhibits 201-222.
2022-08-10 • Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event