Event Details

January 01, 1998

Description

Seventh Circuit decision in United States v. Hach

Participants (2)

Name Type Mentions
Hach person 2 View Entity
Seventh Circuit organization 35 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017673.jpg

Legal Brief / Filing (Page 38 of 78) • 2.27 MB
View

This document is a page from a legal filing by attorney David Schoen, bearing a House Oversight Committee stamp. It presents a legal argument citing a 2007 Utah Law Review article and various precedents (Ritchie, Brady, Hach) to argue that constitutional discovery obligations apply only to the government/state actors, not to third parties or crime victims. The text specifically argues against the ability of defendants to subpoena medical or psychiatric records from third-party witnesses who are not state agents.

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
US Court of Appeals
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
2
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-19 23:09

Additional Data

Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017673.jpg
Date String
1998

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event