February 07, 2005
Ruling in United States v. Bin Laden
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| district court | organization | 595 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009839.jpg
This document is page 41 of a legal filing (Document 643, filed March 11, 2022) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text presents legal arguments citing precedents (Guzman Loera, Bin Laden, Martha Stewart) to oppose an evidentiary hearing regarding juror misconduct allegations based solely on unsworn media reports. The filing argues that newspaper articles and hearsay do not constitute 'incontrovertible evidence' required to justify post-trial juror inquiries.
Events with shared participants
The District Court denied Maxwell's motion to dismiss an indictment.
Date unknown
Denial of Maxwell's motion to modify a protective order.
2020-09-02 • SDNY
District court's opinion in the CVRA litigation
2019-01-01
District court issued an opinion concluding that the government violated the CVRA by failing to consult with victims before entering the NPA.
2019-02-21
The District Court's judgment of conviction for Maxwell was issued.
2022-06-29 • District Court
The District Court denied Maxwell's Rule 33 motion for a new trial.
Date unknown • District Court
A trial where the Government presented evidence, including Jane's testimony, and the jury was instructed by the District Court.
Date unknown • District Court
The District Court found that Maxwell supervised Sarah Kellen, partly based on pilot testimony.
Date unknown • District Court
The Second Circuit issued a writ of mandamus in 'In re U.S.', reversing a District Court's order that directed the Government to produce oral statements from defendants and coconspirators.
1987-01-01
Maxwell's sentencing, where the District Court calculated a Guidelines range of 188 to 235 months' imprisonment and sentenced Maxwell to 240 months' imprisonment.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event