Event Details
December 20, 2018
Description
Epstein's lawyer states he needs to review the brief before taking a position.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epstein's counsel | person | 25 | View Entity |
| The Post | organization | 88 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016496.jpg
This document is page 9 of a legal filing outlining a dispute between 'The Post' and the Manhattan District Attorney's Office regarding the unsealing of appellate briefs related to Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights that while Epstein's counsel took 'no position' on the unsealing, the DA's office reversed its initial stance of 'not opposing' the motion and subsequently opposed it, arguing that the Post failed to notify prosecutors in Florida. The document includes a footnote disputing the legal necessity of notifying Florida prosecutors.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The Post's Motion
Date unknown • Court
Motion by 'The Post' to unseal or produce appellate briefs.
Date unknown • Court
The Post filed a motion to unseal appellate briefs.
2018-12-21 • Manhattan (implied)
Filing of a letter withdrawing the December 21 Motion to address procedural issues.
2019-01-04 • Court
The Post filed a motion requesting an order unsealing appellate briefs with victim names redacted.
2018-12-21 • Manhattan (implied court)
The Post filed a letter withdrawing the December 21 Motion.
2019-01-04 • Court
Motion to unseal appellate briefs
Date unknown • New York Court
The Post's motion to unseal appellate briefs.
Date unknown • New York Court
Acosta sends a letter to Epstein's counsel advising USAO will defer notification of state plea to state officials.
2007-12-19
U.S. Attorney's Office contacts Epstein's counsel to negotiate a resolution (nonprosecution agreement).
2007-01-01 • Southern District of Florida
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event