Event Details
March 11, 2022
Description
Filing of Document 647 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal Counsel | person | 2 | View Entity |
| Defense counsel | person | 578 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
Source Documents (3)
DOJ-OGR-00010283.jpg
This document is page 17 of a legal filing (likely a defense motion) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), arguing that certain counts in the indictment are multiplicitous. It details how the government incorporated the allegations of a witness named Carolyn (covering 2001-2004) into existing Mann Act conspiracies dating back to 1994, alongside victims Jane and Annie. The text highlights that Maxwell allegedly invited Carolyn to travel from Florida with Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00010272.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing (Document 647, filed March 11, 2022) in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that the jury may have erroneously convicted Maxwell on Counts One, Three, and Four based on a finding that she intended sexual activity to occur in New Mexico, rather than New York as required by law. The text cites a 'Jury Note' (Court Exhibit #15) as evidence that the jury was confused about the location requirement and asserts the Court failed to correct this misunderstanding.
DOJ-OGR-00010278.jpg
This document is page 12 of a defense filing (Document 647) dated March 11, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues that the jury instructions were insufficient and led to a 'constructive amendment' of the indictment, potentially allowing the jury to convict Maxwell based on activity in New Mexico rather than the required New York jurisdiction. It highlights a 'Jury Note' demonstrating the jury's confusion regarding Count Four and the application of New York Penal Law Section 130.55.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
Filing of Document 172-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
2021-03-23 • US District Court
A status conference originally scheduled for January 14, 2021, was adjourned to March 17, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. The conference is to be conducted remotely via videoconferencing software.
2021-03-17 • Remote (videoconference)
Filing made after U.S. Attorney's Office declined to agree to add Roberts to the case.
0030-12-01 • Unknown
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
Filing of Joint Proposed Juror Questionnaire and Voir Dire documents in US v. Maxwell
2021-10-13 • Court
A court document (Document 36) was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, outlining the rules for handling discovery materials.
2020-07-30
An endorsement was filed granting a request for a video monitor for defense counsel, signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
2021-11-22 • 40 Foley Square
Proposed UMC (Uniform Motion Calendar) Hearing
2009-08-20 • Court (implied)
Scheduled Deposition (conflicts with proposed hearing)
2009-08-20 • Unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event