Event Details
January 01, 2015
Description
Henderson v Government of Australia case cited as precedent.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Henderson | person | 37 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00002105.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 14, 2020, analyzes arguments against Ms. Maxwell's extradition, specifically addressing claims of political motivation, abuse of process, and the impact of the passage of time. It asserts that it is highly unlikely Ms. Maxwell could establish bad faith by the US prosecutor or that her extradition is politically motivated or oppressive. The document cites various legal precedents to support the view that the public interest in honoring extradition arrangements and trying serious allegations outweighs potential personal hardship or the passage of time since the alleged offences (1994-1997).
Related Events
Events with shared participants
United States v. Henderson, 337 F.3d 914, 920 (7th Cir. 2003)
2003-01-01 • 7th Cir.
A trial that the author indicates might not have happened without her attorneys.
Date unknown
Filing of Document 681-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
2022-06-26 • US Court System
Submission of letter regarding CVRA rights and unsealing of grand jury materials.
2025-08-05 • New York, NY
Submission of legal letter regarding unsealing of grand jury materials.
2025-08-05 • New York, NY (SDNY)
Filing of Affirmation of Brittany N. Henderson in Support of Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice
2020-01-13 • US District Court, SDNY
Brittany N. Henderson admitted to practice law in Florida
2015-09-21 • Florida
Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed by Brittany N. Henderson
2019-08-27 • Southern District of New York
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event