Event Details
February 15, 2012
Description
A trial where Ms. Conrad and eleven other jurors rendered a verdict against Paul M. Daugerdas.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| eleven other jurors | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Ms. Conrad | person | 69 | View Entity |
| PAUL M. DAUGERDAS | person | 222 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009927.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the direct examination of Ms. Conrad, a former juror in the case against Paul M. Daugerdas. The questioning focuses on her financial situation, her memory of prior court proceedings, and her past confrontational statements to the court, such as calling her husband a "convicted felon" whom she might retain as a lawyer and telling the court that her finances were "none of your business." Ms. Conrad's testimony is evasive and hostile, suggesting a contentious relationship with the court and the defendant's counsel.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Filing of an appendix (Volume XVI of XVII) in the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
2014-02-24 • United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
The jury acquitted Maxwell on 'count two' of the charges against her, which related specifically to the accuser Jane.
Date unknown
A court proceeding for the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.
2012-02-15 • SOUTHERN DISTRICT
Ms. Conrad was asked by the Court if she owned any stocks or bonds, to which she replied "none of your business."
2025-12-20 • Federal Court
A date mentioned in a question to Ms. Conrad, possibly related to the trial or a related proceeding.
2011-03-01 • Federal Court
Judge Pauley explained the purpose of voir dire to the jury pool (venire), including Ms. Conrad.
Date unknown • Federal Court
The government received Ms. Conrad's letter.
2025-05-01
The jury deliberated for five full days in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. During this time, some jurors initially doubted two accusers until juror Scotty David shared his personal story.
2021-01-01 • New York City, U.S.
Afternoon session of a court inquiry, addressing matters that developed over the luncheon recess, including a financial affidavit from Ms. Conrad and her voice mail message. Examination of 'The Answerer' regarding finances.
2012-02-15 • Court
Court proceedings for the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.
Date unknown • Southern District
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event