August 10, 2022
Court filing date of the transcript document (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | person | 1588 | View Entity |
| A. Farmer | person | 547 | View Entity |
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
| MS. MENNINGER | person | 1436 | View Entity |
| Ms. Comey | person | 1419 | View Entity |
| JANE | person | 1277 | View Entity |
| MR. PAGLIUCA | person | 1022 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00013700.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the cross-examination of A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) during the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense attorney questions Farmer to establish that she never mentioned Ghislaine Maxwell in any of her journals, including those written in Thailand and during her senior year, even after the alleged 'New Mexico event' occurred. The page also includes procedural dialogue regarding the display of Exhibit 604.
DOJ-OGR-00017766.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It features a legal argument during the cross-examination of a witness identified as 'Jane.' Ms. Menninger attempts to question Jane about her knowledge of statements her lawyer made to the government regarding how her testimony might impact civil litigation. Ms. Moe (Jane's counsel) objects, arguing that this line of questioning is an attempt to bypass attorney-client privilege and does not constitute valid impeachment.
DOJ-OGR-00019071.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony confirms the identities and roles of several Epstein associates: Jeff Shantz as his attorney, Eva Dubin (née Anderson) as his former girlfriend who later married billionaire Glenn Dubin, and Russ Kippus as a relief pilot. The witness confirms Glenn Dubin is a hedge fund manager but is unsure if he was an Epstein client.
DOJ-OGR-00013223.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) covering the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The text details a legal argument between prosecutor Ms. Comey and defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding the admissibility of questions about specific paragraphs (39, 51, 57) of a complaint. Ms. Comey explicitly describes an incident where Jeffrey Epstein brought another female into a room and penetrated the victim twice.
Events with shared participants
Maxwell taught Jane how to massage Epstein, which led to the abuse.
Date unknown
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
A deposition was conducted, as evidenced by the transcript.
Date unknown • Not specified
Deposition of an unnamed witness conducted by Mr. Edwards, with Mr. Pagliuca present as counsel. The topic is photographs taken by an unnamed male.
Date unknown • Not mentioned
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A summation by Ms. Moe recounting Jane's testimony was filed with the court.
2022-08-10
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event