January 01, 2000
A hypothetical offense committed against a 16-year-old in the year 2000 is used as an example to explain the effect of the 2003 amendment.
DOJ-OGR-00021695.jpg
This legal document argues that the legislative history of a statute of limitations for child sex abuse offenses demonstrates Congress's clear intent for a 2003 amendment to apply retroactively to pre-enactment conduct. It cites a conference report and the 9th Circuit case United States v. Sure Chief to support its position. The document also refutes an argument by Maxwell that the statute's language is only "forward-looking," using a hypothetical offense from the year 2000 to illustrate the amendment's intended effect.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event