Event Details

January 01, 2000

Description

A hypothetical offense committed against a 16-year-old in the year 2000 is used as an example to explain the effect of the 2003 amendment.

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00021695.jpg

Unknown type • 681 KB
View

This legal document argues that the legislative history of a statute of limitations for child sex abuse offenses demonstrates Congress's clear intent for a 2003 amendment to apply retroactively to pre-enactment conduct. It cites a conference report and the 9th Circuit case United States v. Sure Chief to support its position. The document also refutes an argument by Maxwell that the statute's language is only "forward-looking," using a hypothetical offense from the year 2000 to illustrate the amendment's intended effect.

Event Metadata

Type
hypothetical event
Location
Unknown
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
0
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 17:40

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00021695.jpg
Date String
2000

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event