February 12, 2004
Trial and conviction of the Irvine Ten.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| prosecutors | person | 54 | View Entity |
| Jury | person | 126 | View Entity |
| The Irvine Ten | person | 2 | View Entity |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017225.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the style and context of House Oversight documents) dated April 2, 2012. It discusses the legal and ethical implications of the 'Irvine Ten' case, where students were prosecuted for disrupting a speech by Ambassador Michael Oren at the University of California. The author argues that prosecuting the students was necessary to protect First Amendment rights and the open marketplace of ideas, criticizing the ACLU's stance on the matter.
Events with shared participants
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The jury convicted the defendant on five counts.
Date unknown
Federal court hearing where declarant learned of the secret plea deal.
2008-07-01 • Federal Court
Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Projected start of opening statements.
2021-11-29 • SDNY
Deadline set by Acosta for prosecutors not to issue victim notification letters (5 p.m. Friday).
2007-12-07
An ongoing trial is mentioned, for which exhibits are being prepared and presented.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
The jury's first task is to choose a foreperson.
Date unknown • Jury Room
The court takes a 45-minute luncheon recess. Proceedings are scheduled to resume with opening statements and conclude for the day at 5 p.m.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event