June 01, 2008
Interviews with approx. 40 alleged witnesses
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| witnesses | person | 135 | View Entity |
| USAO | organization | 691 | View Entity |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012139.jpg
A letter from Kirkland & Ellis LLP to John Roth, Esq. dated June 19, 2008, arguing that the USAO is withholding exculpatory Brady evidence regarding witness interviews. The defense alleges the federal prosecution is politically motivated due to Epstein's ties to Bill Clinton and accuses prosecutors AUSA Villafana and FAUSA Sloman of specific ethical misconduct and conflicts of interest.
Events with shared participants
Epstein's attorneys challenged the USAO's position regarding victim notification.
2007-12-01 • N/A
Conference call regarding the review of Epstein's devices.
2020-10-19 • Teleconference
USAO's decision to notify victims about eligibility for monetary damages under § 2255, implemented by letters after Epstein's state pleas.
Date unknown • N/A
Negotiations between Epstein's legal team and the USAO, resulting in benefits for Epstein such as a reduction in prison time and other concessions.
Date unknown
Search of Jeffrey Epstein's residence where a notepad, high school transcript, Joy Jelly (sexual lubricant), photographs of naked teenage girls, a massage table, and video tapes were located and collected. The house was secured and the exit videotaped. Atty. Guy Fronstein was encountered representing Mr. Epstein.
Date unknown • Jeffrey Epstein's residence (later identified as 358 El Brillo)
Acosta advises the Defense that the USAO will defer to the State Attorney regarding victim notification for the State Plea Hearing, but the USAO would notify victims of the Federal Resolution.
2007-12-19
Legal arguments are being made regarding a defendant's active participation in offenses, the sufficiency of proof at trial, and the potential application of a 'conscious avoidance theory' instruction to the jury, particularly concerning cases involving children.
2022-08-10 • court
A summation by Ms. Moe in the trial of Maxwell, arguing for her guilt.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied Southern District)
Ms. Sternheim delivers an opening statement in a legal case against Ms. Maxwell, discussing the government's approach to 'grooming' and the financial incentives for witnesses from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund.
2022-08-10 • court
Mr. Epstein made a payment to a witness.
2018-01-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event