Event Details

January 01, 2016

Description

Supreme Court case Williams v. Pennsylvania, addressing judicial bias.

Participants (1)

Name Type Mentions
Supreme Court location 22 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026282.jpg

Government Document / Legal Analysis • 2.33 MB
View

This document, from a House Oversight file, presents a legal argument that the special counsel investigation led by Robert Mueller was tainted from its origin. It cites an inspector general's report on Peter Strzok's text messages as evidence of bias that cast a 'cloud' over the FBI's 'Crossfire' investigation, arguing the entire effort became 'fruit of a poisonous tree.' The author supports this due process violation claim with several Supreme Court precedents regarding prosecutorial and judicial bias. The document does not contain any information related to Jeffrey Epstein.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Supreme Court case Blackledge v. Perry, addressing prosecutorial vindictiveness.

1974-01-01 • U.S.

View

The Supreme Court rejects Section 3 of DOMA in the case United States v. Windsor.

0013-08-28 • United States

View

Supreme Court holds that muni bonds are still tax-free in Kentucky v. Davis.

0008-05-30

View

Supreme Court affirms that trust investment advisory fees are subject to a 2% floor (Knight case).

0008-01-28

View

Issuance of a Supreme Court opinion (likely NYT v Sullivan) regarding the Sedition Act.

1964-01-01 • Supreme Court

View

Supreme Court's Windsor decision regarding DOMA

2013-06-01 • Washington D.C.

View

Supreme Court decision in Flemming v. Nestor

1960-01-01 • USA

View

Roe v. Wade

Date unknown • US Supreme Court

View

Bush v. Gore

2000-01-01 • US Supreme Court

View

DeFunis v. Odegaard Supreme Court case.

1974-01-01 • Washington D.C.

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Pennsylvania
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
1
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-19 03:23

Additional Data

Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026282.jpg
Date String
2016

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event