Event Details
January 01, 2016
Description
Meeting between AUSA-1 and Boies Schiller which resulted in no action by USAO-SDNY.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUSA-1 | person | 10 | View Entity |
| Boies Schiller | person | 6 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00003052.jpg
This document page is from a government filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), arguing that the prosecution did not improperly use civil discovery materials or mislead the court. The government distinguishes its actions from the 'Chemical Bank' precedent, noting that while AUSA-1 met with the law firm Boies Schiller in February 2016, no action was taken then, and the actual investigation began in November 2018 independent of improper influence.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A lawsuit between Giuffre and Maxwell, which involved a bitter, hard-fought, and wide-ranging discovery process spanning over a year.
Date unknown
The parties entered a stipulated Protective Order. Boies Schiller proposed adding a 'law enforcement' exception, which Maxwell rejected.
Date unknown
The defendant responded to Boies Schiller’s questions during two depositions.
Date unknown
Giuffre, represented by Boies Schiller, filed a civil defamation lawsuit against Maxwell.
2015-01-01 • Southern District of New York
Boies Schiller met with the Government to urge an investigation of Epstein and Maxwell.
2016-01-01
AUSA-1 met with a lawyer from Boies Schiller and two other attorneys about Epstein.
2016-01-01
Boies Schiller met with the Government again to ask if they would consider charging the defendant with perjury.
Date unknown
Two civil depositions of Ghislaine Maxwell were conducted as part of the 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' defamation lawsuit.
Date unknown • S.D.N.Y.
Boies Schiller proposed adding a 'law enforcement' exception to the Protective Order, which Maxwell rejected.
Date unknown
Attorneys met with AUSA-1 to discuss individuals who worked for Epstein, focusing on Maxwell. They did not suggest specific criminal statutes or investigative steps.
2016-01-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event