Event Details
August 10, 2022
Description
A discussion took place in court regarding the appropriateness of sending new legal instructions to the jury. The defense's proposed instruction for Count Two was analyzed and criticized by the judge.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| the Judge | person | 138 | View Entity |
| Unnamed speaker | person | 72 | View Entity |
| Mr. Everdell | person | 1327 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00014719.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument about jury instructions. An attorney argues that the existing instructions are sufficient and that sending new, confusing ones would be a mistake. The judge ('THE COURT') then critiques the defense's newly proposed instruction, stating it addresses a count the jury didn't ask about and contains a legally incorrect paragraph concerning sexual activity involving a person named 'Jane' in states other than New York.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Cross-examination of witness Visoski by Mr. Everdell regarding flights and the identity of a passenger named Jane.
2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
Jury Deliberation/Instruction
Date unknown • Courtroom
A discussion took place regarding jury instructions, followed by the court calling a recess.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
The Court called a 10-minute break in the proceedings.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
Attorneys and the judge discuss the procedure for presenting evidence to the jury.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
The jury is instructed on how to conduct their deliberations in the criminal case against Ms. Maxwell.
2021-12-19
Discussion about a witness coming from the U.K. who cannot be present until Monday.
Date unknown
A discussion in court between the judge and Mr. Everdell regarding the admissibility of testimony and evidence related to property records.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion between the Court and counsel regarding jury instructions, specifically concerning the interpretation of New Mexico law on illegal sexual activity and how evidence should be presented to the jury. The Court indicates it will consider the points raised and re-propose instructions.
2021-12-10 • Courtroom (implied)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event