Unknown (Past)
Alleged sexual activity involving Accuser 2.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accuser 2 | person | 6 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00011653.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that the government's proposed jury instructions are confusing and contrasts them with the defense's position. The argument centers on jurisdiction and the age of consent, specifically regarding 'Accuser 2' and acts committed in New Mexico that were allegedly legal under New Mexico law at the time, versus how they are treated under New York conspiracy law.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event