Event Details
April 13, 2020
Description
Deadline for parties to confer and stipulate protocol for document exchange.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| plaintiff | person | 42 | View Entity |
| defendants | person | 21 | View Entity |
Source Documents (2)
026.pdf
This document is a Discovery Plan and Proposed Scheduling Order filed on February 6, 2020, in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The Plaintiff requests broad discovery including flight logs, financial records, Amazon history, and communications with government officials and co-conspirators, while the Co-Executors attempt to limit the scope strictly to the Plaintiff's alleged abuse. The document outlines proposed deadlines for document requests, HIPAA releases, and expert discovery, noting significant disagreements between the parties on the timing of these phases.
015.pdf
This document is a Discovery Plan and Proposed Scheduling Order filed on February 6, 2020, in the case of Teresa Helm v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff outlines broad discovery requests, including Epstein's flight logs, helicopter logs, financial records, Amazon order history, and communications with government officials and co-conspirators. The Co-Executors attempt to limit the scope of discovery strictly to the alleged abuse of the plaintiff and her damages, and the document outlines conflicting proposed deadlines for the discovery process.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Discussion of the 'Sabhnani' case, a Second Circuit case
Date unknown
Approximate start of abuse against Plaintiff (26 years prior to 2020, when she was 14).
1994-01-01 • Unknown
Initial Pretrial Conference set to occur.
2019-12-06 • Court
Concluding defendants did not present a flight risk
1990-01-01 • D. Mass.
The Government produced hundreds of hours of video surveillance footage dating back to July 5, 2019, as part of its discovery obligations.
2019-07-05
A telephone conference was held where the Court questioned the defendants about their knowledge of issues with Juror Conrad.
0015-07-01
A status conference, originally scheduled for September 9, 2020, was adjourned to September 10, 2020, at 1:00 p.m. The conference will be conducted remotely via videoconferencing. Audio access is provided for co-counsel, press, and the public via phone with an access code.
2020-09-10 • Remote (videoconference)
The underlying legal trial during which Conrad served as a juror.
Date unknown
The Court held a telephone conference to inquire about the defendants' knowledge of facts concerning Juror Conrad.
2025-11-07
One or both of the defendants in the indictment may have conducted rounds or inmate counts.
2019-08-10
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event