Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
A legal proceeding discussed in the document where evidentiary rules do not apply and the Government can present evidence by proffer.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A judicial officer | person | 0 | View Entity |
| The government | organization | 3113 | View Entity |
| the defendant | person | 996 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00000950.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a court filing, likely a memorandum from the prosecution ('the Government'), arguing for the pre-trial detention of a defendant. The document cites U.S. legal code, specifically 18 U.S.C. § 3142, to assert that the defendant is an extreme flight risk and that a statutory presumption for detention applies due to the alleged offenses involving the sexual exploitation of minors. The argument focuses on the nature of the offense and the strength of the evidence as factors weighing in favor of detention.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Real Estate Purchase under fake name
Date unknown • Unknown
Carolyn engaged in sex acts with Epstein in exchange for money, arranged by the defendant.
Date unknown
A meeting where the government showed the witness (Visoski) records of three flights.
Date unknown
The defendant conspired with Epstein to traffic Carolyn and other minors for sex.
Date unknown
The defendant personally recruited Virginia while she was a minor.
Date unknown • Virginia
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The jury convicted the defendant on five counts.
Date unknown
The Government entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein.
2007-01-01
Lawyers for accusers met with the Government to convince them to open an investigation of Ms. Maxwell.
2016-01-01
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event