Event Details
June 17, 2009
Description
Court granted Plaintiff's motion and entered a default against Kellen.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SARAH KELLEN | person | 569 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
048.pdf
This is a legal reply filed by Sarah Kellen's attorney in July 2009, requesting the court set aside a default judgment in the case brought by Jane Doe II. The document argues that service of process in New York was legally deficient because the 'nail and mail' method was used without proper due diligence (attempts were made when Kellen was known to be out of town) and that the default was entered prematurely before the response deadline. Kellen also asserts a meritorious defense, stating she did not conspire with Jeffrey Epstein to commit sexual battery and was unaware of what occurred privately between Epstein and the Plaintiff.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.
2020-02-04 • New York
Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order.
Date unknown
Voir dire process where Juror 50 stated he had no doubt about his ability to be fair and impartial.
Date unknown
Jury deliberations during which the jury sent a note inquiring about the proper basis to convict under Count Four.
Date unknown
The document is an argument concerning the sentencing of Ms. Maxwell, specifically regarding the application of guideline § 4B1.5.
Date unknown
Initial Pretrial Conference set to occur.
2019-12-06 • Court
The document discusses arguments and evidence to be presented at an upcoming trial, including the Government's intention to argue certain individuals are co-conspirators.
Date unknown
Defendant points the Court to civil law regarding plaintiffs proceeding by pseudonyms
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event