Trial
Discussions regarding jury instructions and notes.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
| The government | organization | 3113 | View Entity |
| the defendant | person | 996 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00010396.jpg
This document page is from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated April 29, 2022, concerning the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. It discusses a dispute over the interpretation of a jury note regarding 'Count Four,' specifically whether the jury was considering conduct in New Mexico versus New York state law. The text details arguments about a missing comma in the note and the Court's instruction that New York law was the governing statute, even if New Mexico events were relevant to intent.
Events with shared participants
Real Estate Purchase under fake name
Date unknown • Unknown
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
Carolyn engaged in sex acts with Epstein in exchange for money, arranged by the defendant.
Date unknown
A meeting where the government showed the witness (Visoski) records of three flights.
Date unknown
The defendant conspired with Epstein to traffic Carolyn and other minors for sex.
Date unknown
The defendant personally recruited Virginia while she was a minor.
Date unknown • Virginia
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The jury convicted the defendant on five counts.
Date unknown
The Government entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein.
2007-01-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event